Leesburg Florida Archives - Coach Houses at Leesburg

Judge Dan R Mosley accused of Corruption in Coach Houses at Leesburg Scandal

Judge Dan R Mosley (aka Danny Ray) has been accused of corruption in the Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium Scandal as has the law firm of Clayton & McCulloh.

In May 2019, Governor Ron DeSantis appointed Judge Dan R. Mosley. It took Judge Dan just a year to start inflicting his bias and prejudice. He established early on that he is a heartless judge who would probably pull someone out of the hospital with COVID-19 because he wanted them to appear in a Zoom Hearing.

William M. Windsor asks anyone who has been abused by corrupt Judge Dan R. Mosley to contact him. William M. Windsor is filing an Open Records request as he seeks to determine if Judge Dan has ever ruled in favor of a pro se party and whether his rulings show bias for big law firms with lots of money.

In a recent court hearing, Judge Dan R Mosley indicated he had not even read the Complaint in Case No. 2020-CA-001438 in Lake County Circuit Court before he ruled against the pro se Plaintiff and in favor of attorneys with huge law firms.

Complaints against Judge Danny Ray Mosley have been filed with the Fifth District Court of Appeals and will be filed with the State Attorney, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Chief Judge of the Lake County Circuit Court, the Judicial Disqualification Board, the Florida State Bar Association, the Lake County Sheriff’s Department, and Governor Ron DeSantis.

En Banc Complaint

Complaint for Writ of Prohibition

The entire story will be told RIGHT HERE.

Reasons to Avoid Buying a Condo

Do not buy a condo

There are many reasons to avoid buying a condo. As a condo owner for three years after owning homes for 35 years, I advise you to stay as far away from condo ownership as possible.

There are a number of articles online about the Pros and Cons of Condo Ownership, but they seem to be written by real estate people who want to promote the sales of condos.

Money Crashers has a good article titled Pros & Cons of Buying a Condo – Is It Worth It?

Realtor.com has Should I Buy a Condo? The Pros and Cons. Guess what they think! LOL.

PocketSense has Reasons Not to Buy a Condo. There is some good information in this article, but I believe all of these articles sugarcoat it and don’t seem to have true knowledge of condo ownership.

Reasons to Avoid Buying a Condo — Just DON’T

If you can afford to buy a home, buy a home. And buy one that doesn’t have a homeowner’s association. If you can’t afford to buy a home, I recommend that you rent a home, condo, or apartment. (Condos are usually nicer than apartments.) As a renter, your landlord has all of the problems discussed below…NOT YOU!

It’s Amateur Hour

Your neighbors run the condo. Do you really want a widowed senior citizen from Pasadena who was always a stay-at-home-mom deciding how you must spend your money?

Your condo association will be “managed” by people elected by you and your fellow owners.

From my experience, these people don’t know what they are doing and/or they have ulterior motives. As Board members, these folks are all-powerful. They have control of all the money and how anything and everything is done.

You Don’t Really Own Anything with a Condo – Reasons to Avoid Buying a Condo

Inside the walls of a condo Condo unit owners do not hold the title to the land on which the structure sits, so you only own what’s inside the walls, which is air.

With a house, you own the land and the building.

Please understand: You don’t own squat with a condo. I own 1,600-square-feet of air.

At Coach Houses at Leesburg, the owners are not allowed to rent their units, so no AirBnB income potential. That’s a bad deal.

You have No Control Over What it Will Cost YOU to Live in YOUR Condo in the Future

You have no control over the costs in a condo When I bought my condo, the monthly assessment (dues) was $300 per month. Thirteen months later, the three-member Board of Directors voted to increase my monthly assessment to $980 per month. SERIOUSLY!

I’m 72-years-old, disabled, divorced, live alone, and my sole source of income is social security retirement. $980 per month is half of my monthly social security payment. I was at break-even at $300 per month, but I am now having to use very limited savings to live in the condo that I allegedly own.

My Condo Association forecloses on people who are just a month or two late. If they foreclose on you, they own your condo, and you are homeless. I can’t risk that. I pray I can find someone who thinks they want to live in a condo to buy mine so I can move as far away from here as possible before I lose my condo.

Your State Agency that “Manages” the Condominium Businesses is Probably Incompetent and Possibly Corrupt

In Florida, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation is responsible for the condominium business. I thought I would be saved by the government of the State of Florida. You are led to believe that these paid government employees are there to help condo owners. Nope. I believe the DBPR is totally corrupt. They are buddies with the condo association attorneys and condo association management companies who are your enemies as a lowly condo owner.

If your Board violates every rule in the book and you complain to the agency and they screw you, you could lose tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The only way to be protected is to NOT buy a condo.

Click on the Tag for “Department of Business and Professional Regulation” below, and it will link you to every page in my story that discusses DBPR.

Reasons to Avoid Buying a Condo – You are Legally Screwed in a Condo

You are legally screwed in a condo Any time any of us have to go to a courthouse, we are screwed. Justice in America is rare for folks who aren’t rich or connected. If you have to hire a lawyer, you have to pay to be screwed.

If you get into litigation with the condo association, they get to use your money to pay their lawyers to screw you. In my case, the never-lawfully-elected Board has spent over $130,000 fighting me as I simply try to get them to operate legally. Why in God’s name would these people spend that kind of money? They must be hiding some bad stuff. Our condos are only valued at about $60,000. And by the way, guess who gets to pay part of that $130,000? You guessed it: ME. Screwed again.

There is no way to win legally because the corrupt deck is stacked against you. I’m doing it because I hate, loathe, and despise liars.

You can Lose Your Condo Home if the Condo Association seeks to Screwzee Vouzee Youzee.

You can be screwed by your condo association As I said before, you have no control, and your condo association can pretty much do whatever they want to you.

If the condo association raises your dues to an amount that you can’t afford, they can foreclose and take your condo, and you get nothing.

If your condo association does a special assessment for $250,000 to fix faulty foundations, and you are one of 32 owners, you owe $7,812.50. If you can’t pay it, they can foreclose and take your condo.

If the next year, they say $500,000 is needed to repair plumbing, electrical, roofs, or whatever, you owe $15,625. If you can’t pay it, they can foreclose and take your condo, and your “investment” in your home is gone.

How do you like the idea of being homeless? That is one of the risks you take if you buy a condo.

After what I have experienced, I don’t believe anyone in their right mind should buy a condo (except mine, of course, because I need to get the Hell out of Dodge aka Leesburg Florida).

Your Neighbors may be Dumber than The Little Old Lady from Pasadena – Reasons to Avoid Buying a Condo

Do not buy a condo At Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium in Leesburg, Florida, I have been amazed by how dumb many of the owners are. I don’t mean to be rude, I’m just telling it like it is. Dumb people are easily manipulated by those in power (the Board).

These folks do not seem to have any understanding of laws or legal documents, and they can’t afford attorneys. Most just want to live in peace and hope they can ignore what’s going on around them.

The Condominium Management Company may be Less than Competent at Best and Corrupt at Worst

Sentry Management was the condo association management company for Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium Association.

Sentry Management is a horrible company, in my experienced opinion. You don’t want anything to do with them. Consider the laws and condo governing documents that SENTRY MANAGEMENT violated at Coach Houses at Leesburg.

A management company is supposed to know the law to ensure the amateur Board members don’t screw up. In my case, SENTRY MANAGEMENT violated the laws and rules again and again and again. From my evaluation, the only reason for them to act as they did was to try to cover up for their malpractice.

You Could Go to Jail

Tavares Florida Police issue an All Points Bulletin for a Condo Owner Believe it or not, Sentry Management and Clayton and McCulloh tried to have me arrested for attempting to speak at a condo meeting.

The Tavares Police Department actually issued an All Points Bulletin for me.

I attended a meeting held at the offices of Sentry Management. About half of the owners of Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium Association were there. I tried to speak. Association members are allowed by Florida law to speak on as many of the Agenda items as they choose. Charlie Ann Aldridge refused to allow me to speak. She ordered me to leave. I immediately gathered my stuff and got up to leave to have her escort me out, and she summoned the Tavares Police Department. I later learned all of this had been set up in advance with the Tavares Police Department by Neal McCulloh of Clayton & McCulloh, the Association’s law firm. I kid you not.

The Condo Association’s Attorneys may be Incompetent at Best and Corrupt at Worst

Clayton and McCulloh of Maitland, Florida is the law firm for Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium Association, Inc.

I have sued CLAYTON & MCCULLOH for malpractice. Read the linked portion of my lawsuit about the wrongdoing and malpractice of Clayton and McCulloh. If you decide to retain them after reading this, I believe you will undoubtedly make an outstandingly incompetent Board member or a potentially-screwed condo owner.

I believe CLAYTON AND MCCULLOH has committed the largest case of legal malpractice in history, at least with condominiums. I believe Clayton and McCulloh’s attorneys are either absolutely incompetent or corrupt or both. I believe both.

Click on the Tag for “Clayton and McCulloh” below, and it will link you to every page in my story that discusses CLAYTON AND MCCULLOH.

You should also read my article about all the malpractice committed by Clayton and McCulloh.

Here is a pdf file of my BIG lawsuit regarding Coach Houses at Leesburg.

I’m Going to Begin Helping Other Condo Owners with Problems

I’m William M. Windsor. I’m not an attorney… just smarter than most attorneys. I know a lot about condo laws and related problems in Florida. If you need help, email me at billwindsor1@outlook.com, or call 352-577-9988 and leave a message for a return call.

So, I’m becoming a Florida Condominium Consultant.

As I’m not an attorney, I don’t have to charge hundreds of dollars an hour. $25 bucks an hour. I can at least tell you how badly I feel you are screwed. I can definitely give you a game plan for fighting the wrongdoing. You should get $25 worth of “pleasure” out of speaking to a fellow screwee.

I didn’t write this article to start a new business, but when I got to the bottom of the page, I realize I have a valuable service to provide.

The Sad Story of Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominiums

I am VERY sorry to say that I own a condominium in Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominiums in Leesburg, Florida.

I have been battling since December 2018 to get the Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium Association, Inc. (“ASSOCIATION”) to abide by Florida Laws and the corporate governing documents that the ASSOCIATION and all owners are obligated to comply with.

Why would some condo owners spend as much as $200,000 fighting my efforts to get the ASSOCIATION to operate legally? Our 32 condos are now going for about $60,000, so what in the world are people hiding? It’s absolutely crazy.

I believe Sentry Management, Inc., the former condo association management company, and Clayton & McCulloh, the law firm “representing” the ASSOCIATION are primarily at fault. They are largely responsible for literally hundreds of violations. I believe this is the largest case of malpractice in the condo business in history.

I have sued a group I call “the evildoers.” I’m going to tell the whole story right here.

To read about the BIG Lawsuit, Click here for links to the entire lawsuit, by section.

Windsor v. Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium Lawsuit – FACTS – FEBRUARY 2019

This is a continuation of the lawsuit regarding Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium, as violation of Florida law on inspection of records begins.

On February 6, 2019, WINDSOR sent an email to ART SWANTON of SENTRY MANAGEMENT asking Sentry to advise what they needed for the Nielsen Trust vote to count. WINDSOR also asked him to advise if Sentry considered the current directors and officers to be legally elected. [EXHIBIT 291.] WINDSOR explained why those acting as directors and officers were not legally elected (based upon the information I had at that time). There was no response.
On February 7, 2019, WINDSOR sent an email to OMAR, VICKI, and KAREN, BRIAN of CLAYTON & MCCULLOH, and CHARLIE ANN of SENTRY asking the purported directors to step down. [EXHIBIT 375.] There was no response.
On February 12, 2019, the written Agreements / Ballots for the second Election/Recall effort were served on the registered agent for the ASSOCIATION. [EXHIBIT 30 is the cover letter and evidence regarding the Nielsen Trust voters.] [EXHIBIT 31 contains the Agreements / Ballots.] [EXHIBIT 32 is the receipt for service on the registered agent.] Additional copies were served on the President, property manager, and registered agent. EXHIBIT 984 is the certified mail receipt. 18 owners voted, and all 18 voted to elect ISABEL Campbell, Jason Chandler, and Joseph L. Lunsford. That’s 100%.
On February 14, 2019, a purported special Board Meeting was held. [EXHIBIT 33.] No minutes were published for the purported meeting. OMAR, VICKI, and KAREN approved spending approximately $27,000 with American GeoTechnical and Gartner Group on foundation repairs for Building A despite other bids that were much lower. WINDSOR objected. Jack Gries, the engineer hired to identify the problem and recommend contractors to do the repair, told WINDSOR that he would be happy with any of the bidders. EXHIBIT 251 contains bids for $17,767 and $13,575. These bids were concealed from the owners; WINDSOR obtained them through an Inspection of Records in March 2019.
On February 15, 2019, WINDSOR sent an email to OMAR, VICKI, and KAREN, BRIAN of CLAYTON & MCCULLOH, and CHARLIE ANN of SENTRY about failure to produce records in response to his Request for Inspection. WINDSOR enclosed the bogus August 2017 minutes for Baywood Condominiums. WINDSOR advised them that if the requested documents were not produced, he would have to file a complaint with the Division of Condominiums. [EXHIBIT 274.] WINDSOR had not received minutes for an August 2017 meeting of the ASSOCIATION. EXHIBIT 1031 is the copy of the email received by the ASSOCIATION that was produced at an Inspection of Records on June 21, 2019.
On February 15, 2019, WINDSOR sent an email to OMAR, VICKI, and KAREN, BRIAN of CLAYTON & MCCULLOH, and CHARLIE ANN of SENTRY with a Request for Inspection of Records. [EXHIBIT 343.] WINDSOR again requested minutes showing there was ever a valid election of directors. WINDSOR again requested proof that there were votes to amend the BYLAWS to change the date of the annual meeting and election. WINDSOR asked for proof that nominating committees had been used and nominations from the floor at annual meetings had been offered. WINDSOR never received proof.
EXHIBIT 1032 is a copy of the February 18, 2019 letter received by CHARLIE ANN that was produced at an Inspection of Records on June 21, 2019. This was about defamation by CHARLIE ANN. This letter gave her notice to preserve relevant information as litigation was anticipated.
On February 19, 2019 at 2:00 pm, a purported Special Board Meeting was called to order. It was adjourned at approximately 2:14 pm. [EXHIBIT 406.] No minutes were published for the purported meeting. EXHIBIT 305-1 and EXHIBIT 305-2 is the video from the meeting. OMAR announced the notice of the “Recall” was deemed proper and was received on February 12, 2019. [EXHIBIT 305-2, 0:25 into the video.] The form of the Agreements / Ballots was accepted. [EXHIBIT 305-2, 1:40 into the video.] (Mrs. Omar Nuseibeh also has a video.) 16 votes were identified as valid. OMAR claimed there were 32 voting interests. [EXHIBIT 305-2, 4:05 to 4:15 in the video.] A Recall of OMAR, VICKI, and KAREN as Directors of the ASSOCIATION was improperly denied on February 19, 2019. [EXHIBIT 305-2, 5:35 into the video.] This is detailed in DBPR Amended Petition in Case No. 2019-02-1020, referenced and incorporated herein. [EXHIBIT 1850.]
The minutes of the February 19, 2019 meeting have not been made available to me. The Board failed to file a petition for recall arbitration. This is a violation of Florida Statute 718.112(2)(j) 3 and Florida Administrative Code 61B-23.0028(3)(b).
WINDSOR objected to the action taken while at the February 19, 2019 meeting, and he had objected to it in writing on several occasions thereafter. [EXHIBIT 305-2, 7:15 into the video.] [EXHIBIT 36.]
On February 19, 2019, WINDSOR sent a letter to BRIAN of CLAYTON & MCCULLOH demanding that OMAR, VICKI, and KAREN be removed. [EXHIBIT 273.] There was no response.
On February 22, 2019, WINDSOR sent a certified letter to Brad Pomp (“BRAD”), the CEO of SENTRY. [EXHIBIT 247.] (EXHIBIT 616 is the Certified Mail Receipt.) WINDSOR advised BRAD that the people acting as the Board were never elected, annual meetings were not being held on the date required by the BYLAWS, that the denial of the Recall / Election was bogus. WINDSOR made an Inspection of Records Request of the alleged letter from MONALENE Werner withdrawing her vote. Neither BRAD nor anyone from SENTRY ever responded. EXHIBIT 1043 is the copy of the letter received by BRAD. This was produced in WINDSOR’s Inspection of Records on June 21, 2019.
On February 22, 2019, WINDSOR made a Request for Inspection of Records by certified mail. [EXHIBIT 45.] Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8. 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 were never produced. This is a violation. (EXHIBIT 613 is the Certified Mail Receipt.)
On February 22, 2019, WINDSOR made a Second Request for Inspection of Records that were not produced when first requested. [EXHIBIT 46.] Nothing was produced. WINDSOR had to file a Complaint with the State. [EXHIBIT 54.] This is a violation. (EXHIBIT 613 is the Certified Mail Receipt.)
On February 23, 2019, WINDSOR sent a certified letter to NEAL McCulloh and Mr. Clayton, the Senior Partners of CLAYTON & MCCULLOH. [EXHIBIT 280.] WINDSOR advised them that the people acting as the Board were never elected; annual meetings were not being held on the date required by the BYLAWS; and the denial of the Recall / Election was bogus. WINDSOR made an Inspection of Records Request of the alleged letter from MONALENE Werner withdrawing her vote. WINDSOR explained that the denial of the Recall / Election was wrong. Neither responded. (EXHIBIT 612 is the Certified Mail Receipt.)
On February 25, 2019, a purported Board Meeting was held. [EXHIBIT 307.] No minutes were published for the purported meeting. EXHIBIT 308-1, EXHIBIT 308-2, EXHIBIT 308-3, EXHIBIT 308-4 is video from the meeting. OMAR, VICKI, and KAREN voted to suspend the voting rights of Donna Dailey and Donna Hey, two of the owners who had voted to recall them.
On February 27, 2019, WINDSOR emailed OMAR, VICKI, and KAREN, SENTRY, and CLAYTON & MCCULLOH asking if the votes of Donna Dailey and Donna Hey would be accepted in a recall / election. They never responded. [EXHIBIT 290.]
On February 27, 2019, WINDSOR made a Second Request for Inspection of Records for additional documents that were not produced when first requested. [EXHIBIT 48.] (EXHIBIT 605 is the Certified Mail Receipt.) Nothing was produced. WINDSOR had to file a Complaint with the State. [EXHIBIT 55.]

Click here for links to the entire lawsuit, by section