Windsor v. Coach Houses at Leesburg Condominium Lawsuit – FACTS – MAY 2019

  1. An Order Vacating Dismissal and Requiring Amended Petition was filed in DBPR Case No. 2019-02-1020 on May 1, 2019. [EXHIBIT 1003.]  WINDSOR was instructed to use a form that would base his first petition for arbitration on Chapter 61-B-50, Florida Administrative Code (specifically Rule 61-B-50.105(2).  [EXHIBIT 1008.]  WINDSOR’s review of that form indicated it was designed for an association board’s filing, so WINDSOR questioned this in the amended petition and incorporated additional information.  MAHLON was setting WINDSOR up for a dismissal.
  2. On May 5, 2019, WINDSOR mailed a Second Notice of Intent to file a Petition for Arbitration regarding the March 22, 2019 meeting.  He sent it to CLAYTON & MCCULLOH giving them until May 13, 2019 before he filed. [EXHIBIT 322.]
  3. On May 5, 2019, WINDSOR emailed a Second Notice of Intent to file a Petition for Arbitration regarding the March 22, 2019 meeting.  WINDSOR sent it to CLAYTON & MCCULLOH, SENTRY, and the ASSOCIATION giving them until May 13, 2019 before he filed. [EXHIBIT 323.]
  4. On May 5, 2019, WINDSOR emailed an addition to his Second Notice of Intent to file a Petition for Arbitration regarding the March 22, 2019 meeting.  WINDSOR sent it to CLAYTON & MCCULLOH, SENTRY, and the ASSOCIATION.  He informed them of two violations of the DECLARATION. [EXHIBIT 324.]
  5. On May 6, 2019, WINDSOR sent an email to DBPR with a link to the form he found on the DBPR website asking if it was to be used for the Petition in Case No. 2019-02-1020. [EXHIBIT 1259.]
  6. On May 7, 2019, WINDSOR sent an email to CLAYTON & MCCULLOH, SENTRY, and the ASSOCIATION advising them that he would be amending his Petition for Arbitration regarding the Election / Recall. [EXHIBIT 407.]  WINDSOR asked them to advise him if they will agree that the Recall / Election passed.  There was no response.
  7. On May 7, 2019, Tia King of DBPR responded regarding WINDSOR’s Petition in Case No. 2019-02-1020 and told him to use the form he emailed on May 6, 2019. [EXHIBIT 1259.]  The form is EXHIBIT 1258.
  8. From April 26, 2019 to May 7, 2019, WINDSOR communicated with Alicia Lawrence and Tia King of DBPR regarding DBPR Case No. 2019-02-1020. [EXHIBIT 1259.]
  9. On May 9, 2019, Tia King of DBPR emailed to admit to WINDSOR that Mahlon C. Rhaney, Jr. made a mistake in the order in DBPR Case No., 2019-02-1020 First Amended Mandatory Non-Binding Petition Form (‚ÄúAMENDED PETITION‚ÄĚ) was not due until Monday, May 13, 2019. [EXHIBIT 1297.]
  10. The First Amended Mandatory Non-Binding Petition Form (‚ÄúAMENDED PETITION‚ÄĚ) was executed on May 9, 2019 and sent to the DBPR for filing in DBPR Case No. 2019-02-1020 with the Second Verified Affidavit of William M. Windsor in Support of Mandatory Non-Binding Petition for Arbitration (‚ÄúSECOND AFFIDAVIT‚ÄĚ) as EXHIBIT F thereto. [EXHIBIT 1009.] [EXHIBIT 1010.]¬† The exhibits referenced therein match the exhibit numbers on the flash drive.
  11. On May 13, 2019, WINDSOR sent the ASSOCIATION a Notice of Intent to Challenge Violations in Building B regarding the patio ‚Äúenhancement‚ÄĚ and the dog urine. [EXHIBIT 1153.]
  12. On May 13, 2019, WINDSOR emailed the ASSOCIATION, Sentry, and CLAYTON & MCCULLOH a Notice of Intent to Challenge Violations in Building B. [EXHIBIT 1154.]
  13. On May 15, 2019, WINDSOR emailed the ASSOCIATION, Sentry, and CLAYTON & MCCULLOH and stated that the Liebls should have been required to clean up violations years ago. [EXHIBIT 1155.]
  14. On May 15, 2019, WINDSOR filed a Petition for Arbitration regarding the March 22, 2019 meeting and election of the ASSOCIATION.  It was assigned DBPR Case No. 2019-02-6384. [EXHIBIT 1011.] [EXHIBIT 1012.]  The exhibits referenced therein match the exhibit numbers on the flash drive. [EXHIBIT 1851 is the complete file.]
  15. On May 15, 2019, WINDSOR sent a copy of his Petition for Arbitration regarding the March 22, 2019 Election to CLAYTON & MCCULLOH and SENTRY. [EXHIBIT 813.]  He also served notice of intent to file a third petition for arbitration regarding additional issues.
  16. On May 23, 2019, WINDSOR served the ASSOCIATION with Notice of Intent to file a Petition for Arbitration regarding failure to produce records in response to Inspection of Records Requests. [EXHIBIT 811.]
  17. On May 28, 2019, Paula Bouie of DBPR sent WINDSOR a letter regarding his first Complaint for Failure to Produce Records in response to Inspection of Records Requests (DBPR Complaint No. 2019019600). [EXHIBIT 602.]  The investigator claimed WINDSOR never responded, but that is incorrect.  WINDSOR has come to realize that everyone with DBPR is corrupt.
  18. On May 30, 2019, an ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER was served on the ASSOCIATION on WINDSOR‚Äôs Petition for Arbitration regarding the March 22, 2019 meeting and election of the ASSOCIATION — Case No. 2019-02-6384. [EXHIBIT 584.]
  19. On May 31, 2019, the DBPR sent WINDSOR a letter regarding his second Complaint for Failure to Produce Records in response to Inspection of Records Requests (DBPR Complaint No. 2019-02-8466). [EXHIBIT 798.]

Click here for links to the entire lawsuit, by section